Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH,
Published online in Articles in Advance, October 7, 2009
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1090.0719
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow e-companion
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shen, Z.

Equilibrium Capacity Expansion Under Stochastic Demand Growth

Alfredo Garcia, Zhijiang Shen

Department of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
Department of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903

agarcia{at}virginia.edu
zs4w{at}virginia.edu

In critical energy infrastructure sectors (e.g., electric power generation, natural gas transportation, oil-refining capacity), maintaining a certain level of excess capacity is socially valuable (because it serves to protect against unexpected market conditions) but not necessarily compatible with the incentives for individual firms in the market. In this paper, we develop a dynamic oligopoly model with a stochastically growing demand to analyze the inherent tension in market-based incentives for capacity expansion where capacity additions take place over long time lags. Our results indicate that the market fails to induce the socially optimal level of capacity. However, the magnitude of this failure varies greatly as a function of entry costs and the relative profitability of investments in the market (as measured by the ratio of maximum markup over production costs and investment costs). In general, the likelihood of insufficient capacity in equilibrium increases with decreasing probability of demand growth, increasing discount and depreciation rates, and/or increasing investment and/or production costs. We discuss the public policy implications of our results.

Subject classifications: capacity expansion; critical infrastructure; dynamic games; Markov perfect equilibrium.
History: Received January 2008; revision received January 2009; accepted March 2009.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.