Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 57, No. 3, May-June 2009, pp. 541-559
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0598
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vetzal, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Dynamic Hedging Under Jump Diffusion with Transaction Costs

J. S. Kennedy, P. A. Forsyth, K. R. Vetzal

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 and Morgan Stanley, New York, New York 10036
David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1

shannon.kennedy{at}morganstanley.com
paforsyt{at}uwaterloo.ca
kvetzal{at}uwaterloo.ca

If the price of an asset follows a jump diffusion process, the market is in general incomplete. In this case, hedging a contingent claim written on the asset is not a trivial matter, and other instruments besides the underlying must be used to hedge in order to provide adequate protection against jump risk. We devise a dynamic hedging strategy that uses a hedge portfolio consisting of the underlying asset and liquidly traded options, where transaction costs are assumed present due to a relative bid-ask spread. At each rebalance time, the hedge weights are chosen to simultaneously (i) eliminate the instantaneous diffusion risk by imposing delta neutrality, and (ii) minimize an objective that is a linear combination of a jump risk and transaction cost penalty function. Because reducing the jump risk is a competing goal vis-à-vis controlling for transaction cost, the respective components in the objective must be appropriately weighted. Hedging simulations of this procedure are carried out, and our results indicate that the proposed dynamic hedging strategy provides sufficient protection against the diffusion and jump risk while not incurring large transaction costs.

Subject classifications: finance; asset pricing.
History: Received April 2006; revision received January 2008; accepted May 2008.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.