Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 57, No. 2, March-April 2009, pp. 439-455
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0631
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cau, T. D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Modeling Implicit Collusion Using Coevolution

E. J. Anderson, T. D. H. Cau

Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia

e.anderson{at}econ.usyd.edu.au
caut{at}agsm.edu.au

Many oligopolies operate as a repeated game. In such circumstances, it can be expected that profit-maximising participants may engage in implicit collusion to profitably increase spot market prices. This paper models the emergence of such implicit collusion in a stylised market model using a coevolutionary approach. Players bid supply functions made up of a finite number of linear pieces. Each player uses a genetic algorithm to find state-based strategies depending on the price and demand in the last period and the predicted demand in the next period. We consider a symmetric duopoly and demonstrate that collusive behaviour can be learned even when there is very limited information available to the participants. Moreover, we show a type of implicit collusive behaviour that occurs even though the system does not settle into a stable equilibrium. We use a wholesale electricity market, in which supply function bids are typical, as a motivating example throughout this paper.

Subject classifications: noncooperative games; repeated games; implicit collusion; genetic algorithm; energy; electricity markets.
History: Received January 2005; revision received January 2008; accepted April 2008.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.