Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 56, No. 6, November-December 2008, pp. 1411-1427
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0614
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maillart, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Diehl, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Assessing Dynamic Breast Cancer Screening Policies

Lisa M. Maillart, Julie Simmons Ivy, Scott Ransom, Kathleen Diehl

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
Office of the President, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas 76107
Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

maillart{at}pitt.edu
jsivy{at}ncsu.edu
sransom{at}hsc.unt.edu
kdiehl{at}med.umich.edu

Questions regarding the relative value and frequency of mammography screening for premenopausal women versus postmenopausal women remain open due to the conflicting age-based dynamics of both the disease (increasing incidence, decreasing aggression) and the accuracy of the test results (increasing sensitivity and specificity). To investigate these questions, we formulate a partially observed Markov chain model that captures several of these age-based dynamics not previously considered simultaneously. Using sample-path enumeration, we evaluate a broad range of policies to generate the set of "efficient" policies, as measured by a lifetime breast cancer mortality risk metric and an expected mammogram count, from which a patient may select a policy based on individual circumstance. We demonstrate robustness with respect to small changes in the input data and conclude that, in general, to efficiently achieve a lifetime risk comparable to the current risk among U.S. women, screening should start relatively early in life and continue relatively late in life regardless of the screening interval(s) adopted. The frontier also exhibits interesting patterns with respect to policy type, where policy type is defined by the relationship between the screening interval prescribed in younger years and that prescribed later in life.

Subject classifications: health care; diagnosis; probability; stochastic model applications; reliability; inspection.
History: Received December 2006; revision received March 2008; accepted June 2008.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.