Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 56, No. 2, March-April 2008, pp. 286-303
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0456
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Glasserman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Fast Pricing of Basket Default Swaps

Zhiyong Chen, Paul Glasserman

Financial Analytics and Structured Transactions Group, Bear Stearns and Company Inc., New York, New York 10179
Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027

zchen1{at}bear.com
pg20{at}columbia.edu

A basket default swap is a derivative security tied to an underlying basket of corporate bonds or other assets subject to credit risk. The value of the contract depends on the joint distribution of the default times of the underlying assets. Valuing a basket default swap often entails Monte Carlo simulation of these default times. For baskets of high-quality credits and for swaps that require multiple defaults to trigger payment, pricing the swap is a rare-event simulation problem. The Joshi-Kainth algorithm is an innovative importance-sampling technique for this problem that forces a predetermined number of defaults to occur on each path. This paper analyzes, extends, and improves the Joshi-Kainth algorithm. We show that, in its original form, the algorithm can actually increase variance; we present an alternative that is guaranteed to reduce variance, even when defaults are not rare. Along the way, we provide a rigorous underpinning in a setting sufficiently general to include both the original method and the version proposed here.

Subject classifications: finance; securities; simulation; efficiency; applications.
History: Received March 2006; revision received July 2006; accepted January 2007.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.