Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 56, No. 1, January-February 2008, pp. 88-101
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0504
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nuyens, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zwart, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Preventing Large Sojourn Times Using SMART Scheduling

Misja Nuyens, Adam Wierman, Bert Zwart

Department of Mathematics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Computer Science Department, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332

misjanuyens{at}gmail.com
adamw{at}caltech.edu
bertzwart{at}gatech.edu

Recently, the so-called class of SMART scheduling policies has been introduced to formalize the common heuristic of "biasing toward small jobs." We study the tail of the sojourn-time (response-time) distribution under both SMART policies and the foreground-background policy (FB) in the GI/GI/1 queue. We prove that these policies behave very well under heavy-tailed service times. Specifically, we show that the sojourn-time tail under all SMART policies and FB is similar to that of the service-time tail, up to a constant, which makes the SMART class superior to first-come-first-served (FCFS). In contrast, for light-tailed service times, we prove that the sojourn-time tail under FB and SMART is larger than that under FCFS. However, we show that the sojourn-time tail for a job of size y under FB and all SMART policies still outperforms FCFS as long as y is not too large.

Subject classifications: queues; priority; limit theorems; probability; stochastic model applications.
History: Received October 2005; revision received September 2006; accepted October 2006.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.