Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 56, No. 1, January-February 2008, pp. 48-58
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0460
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow e-companion
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banker, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Natarajan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Evaluating Contextual Variables Affecting Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis

Rajiv D. Banker, Ram Natarajan

Fox School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122
School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083

banker{at}temple.edu
nataraj{at}utdallas.edu

A DEA-based stochastic frontier estimation framework is presented to evaluate contextual variables affecting productivity that allows for both one-sided inefficiency deviations as well as two-sided random noise. Conditions are identified under which a two-stage procedure consisting of DEA followed by ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis yields consistent estimators of the impact of contextual variables. Conditions are also identified under which DEA in the first stage followed by maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) in the second stage yields consistent estimators of the impact of contextual variables. This requires the contextual variables to be independent of the input variables, but the contextual variables may be correlated with each other. Monte Carlo simulations are carried out to compare the performance of our two-stage approach with one-stage and two-stage parametric approaches. Simulation results indicate that DEA-based procedures with OLS, maximum likelihood, or even Tobit estimation in the second stage perform as well as the best of the parametric methods in the estimation of the impact of contextual variables on productivity. Simulation results also indicate that DEA-based procedures perform better than parametric methods in the estimation of individual decision-making unit (DMU) productivity. Overall, the results establish DEA as a nonparametric stochastic frontier estimation (SFE) methodology.

Subject classifications: organizational studies; productivity; effectiveness/performance; statistics; nonparametric; probability; stochastic model applications; simulation; applications.
History: Received December 2005; revision received March 2007; accepted April 2007.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.