Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 55, No. 4, July-August 2007, pp. 753-768
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0437
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andradóttir, S.
Right arrow Articles by Down, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Compensating for Failures with Flexible Servers

Sigrún Andradóttir, Hayriye Ayhan, Douglas G. Down

H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Department of Computing and Software, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L7

sa{at}isye.gatech.edu
hayhan{at}isye.gatech.edu
downd{at}mcmaster.ca

We consider the problem of maximizing capacity in a queueing network with flexible servers, where the classes and servers are subject to failure. We assume that the interarrival and service times are independent and identically distributed, that routing is probabilistic, and that the failure state of the system can be described by a Markov process that is independent of the other system dynamics. We find that the maximal capacity is tightly bounded by the solution of a linear programming problem and that the solution of this problem can be used to construct timed, generalized round-robin policies that approach the maximal capacity arbitrarily closely. We then give a series of structural results for our policies, including identifying when server flexibility can completely compensate for failures and when the implementation of our policies can be simplified. We conclude with a numerical example that illustrates some of the developed insights.

Subject classifications: queues; networks; optimization; manufacturing; performance; productivity; production/scheduling; flexible manufacturing; line balancing.
History: Received March 2006; revision received July 2006; accepted August 2006.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.