Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 55, No. 2, March-April 2007, pp. 191-197
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0384
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothkopf, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Thirteen Reasons Why the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves Process Is Not Practical

Michael H. Rothkopf

MSIS Department and RUTCOR, Rutgers University, 640 Bartholomew Road, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8003
rothkopf{at}rutcor.rutgers.edu

In theory, the mathematically elegant Vickrey-Clarke-Groves process offers perfect efficiency with dominant truth-revealing strategies. However, it has many serious practical problems. This paper describes these problems and argues that research that aims to maintain the dominant truth-revealing strategies while compromising on the other practical issues is of limited practical value.

Subject classifications: auctions; mechanism design; truth-revealing strategies.
History: Received December 2005; revision received January 2007; accepted January 2007.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.