This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Allon, G. Articles by Federgruen, A. Search for Related Content

Competition in Service Industries

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
g-allon{at}northwestern.edu
af7{at}columbia.edu

We analyze a general market for an industry of competing service facilities. Firms differentiate themselves by their price levels and the waiting time their customers experience, as well as different attributes not determined directly through competition. Our model therefore assumes that the expected demand experienced by a given firm may depend on all of the industry’s price levels as well as a (steady-state) waiting-time standard, which each of the firms announces and commits itself to by proper adjustment of its capacity level. We focus primarily on a separable specification, which in addition is linear in the prices. (Alternative nonseparable or nonlinear specifications are discussed in the concluding section.) We define a firm’s service level as the difference between an upper-bound benchmark for the waiting-time standard () and the firm’s actual waiting-time standard.

Different types of competition and the resulting equilibrium behavior may arise, depending on the industry dynamics through which the firms select their strategic choices. In one case, firms may initially select their waiting-time standards, followed by a selection of their prices in a second stage (service-level first). Alternatively, the sequence of strategic choices may be reversed (price first) or, as a third alternative, the firms may make their choices simultaneously (simultaneous competition). We model each of the service facilities as a single-server M/M/1 queueing facility, which receives a given firm-specific price for each customer served. Each firm incurs a given cost per customer served as well as cost per unit of time proportional to its adopted capacity level.

Subject classifications: queues; multichannel; games; noncooperative; marketing; competitive strategy.
History: Received September 2003; revision received September 2005; accepted November 2005.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Allon and A. Federgruen Competition in Service Industries with Segmented Markets Management Science, April 1, 2009; 55(4): 619 - 634. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Allon and A. Federgruen Service Competition with General Queueing Facilities Operations Research, July 1, 2008; 56(4): 827 - 849. [Abstract] [PDF]