Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 53, No. 2, March-April 2005, pp. 350-362
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1040.0184
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeCroix, G.
Right arrow Articles by Zipkin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

A Series System with Returns: Stationary Analysis

Gregory DeCroix, Jing-Sheng Song, Paul Zipkin

The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708

decroix{at}duke.edu
jssong{at}duke.edu
zipkin{at}duke.edu

This paper analyzes a series inventory system with stationary costs and stochastic demand over an infinite horizon. A distinctive feature is that demand can be negative, representing returns from customers, as well as zero or positive. We observe that, as in a system with nonnegative demand, a stationary echelon base-stock policy is optimal here. However, the steady-state behavior of the system under such a policy is different from that in systems with nonnegative demands. We present an exact procedure and several approximations for computing the operating characteristics and system costs for any stationary echelon base-stock policy, and also describe an algorithm for computing a good policy. As an alternative to the echelon base-stock policy, we discuss a policy that uses only local information. Finally, we describe how to extend the analysis to the case where returns occur at multiple stages instead of just at the stage closest to demand, and the case where returns require a recovery lead time.

Subject classifications: inventory/production: multiechelon; environment: product recovery and remanufacturing.
History: Received May 2002; revision received July 2003; accepted January 2004.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MSOMHome page
X. Su
Consumer Returns Policies and Supply Chain Performance
MSOM, October 1, 2009; 11(4): 595 - 612.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
V. D. R. Guide Jr. and L. N. Van Wassenhove
OR FORUM--The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research
Operations Research, January 1, 2009; 57(1): 10 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
MSOMHome page
G. A. DeCroix, J.-S. Song, and P. H. Zipkin
Managing an Assemble-to-Order System with Returns
MSOM, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 144 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
W. Huang, V. Kulkarni, and J. M. Swaminathan
Managing the Inventory of an Item with a Replacement Warranty
Management Science, August 1, 2008; 54(8): 1441 - 1452.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
G. A. DeCroix
Optimal Policy for a Multiechelon Inventory System with Remanufacturing
Operations Research, May 1, 2006; 54(3): 532 - 543.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
G. A. DeCroix and P. H. Zipkin
Inventory Management for an Assembly System with Product or Component Returns
Management Science, August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1250 - 1265.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.