Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 53, No. 1, January-February 2005, pp. 1-11
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1040.0158
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keeney, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Selecting Attributes to Measure the Achievement of Objectives

Ralph L. Keeney, Robin S. Gregory

Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Box 90120, Durham, North Carolina 27708
Decision Research, 1201 Oak Street, Suite 200, Eugene, Oregon 97401

keeney{at}duke.edu
rgregory{at}interchange.ubc.ca

The foundation for any decision is a clear statement of objectives. Attributes clarify the meaning of each objective and are required to measure the consequences of different alternatives. Unfortunately, insufficient thought typically is given to the choice of attributes. This paper addresses this problem by presenting theory and guidelines for identifying appropriate attributes. We define five desirable properties of attributes: they should be unambiguous, comprehensive, direct, operational, and understandable. Each of these properties is discussed and illustrated with examples, including several cases in which one or more of the desirable properties are not met. We also present a decision model for selecting among the different types of natural, proxy, and constructed attributes.

Subject classifications: decision analysis:multiple criteria; organizational studies:effectiveness/performance; utility/preference:multiattribute.
History: Received October 2003; revision received May 2004; accepted August 2004.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
R. L. Keeney, K. E. See, and D. von Winterfeldt
Evaluating Academic Programs: With Applications to U.S. Graduate Decision Science Programs
Operations Research, September 1, 2006; 54(5): 813 - 828.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
R. Gregory, B. Fischhoff, and T. McDaniels
Acceptable Input: Using Decision Analysis to Guide Public Policy Deliberations
Decision Analysis, March 1, 2005; 2(1): 4 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.