Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 52, No. 6, November-December 2004, pp. 965-976
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1040.0144
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leung, J. M. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lam, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Optimal Cyclic Multi-Hoist Scheduling: A Mixed Integer Programming Approach

Janny M. Y. Leung, Guoqing Zhang, Xiaoguang Yang, Raymond Mak, Kokin Lam

Systems Engineering and Engineering Management Department, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B 3P4
Key Laboratory of Management, Decision, and Information Systems, Institute of Systems Science, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Planning and Engineering Department, Asia Pacific Division, FedEx Express, Hong Kong
Division of Commerce, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong

janny{at}se.cuhk.edu.hk
gzhang{at}uwindsor.ca
xgyang{at}iss.ac.cn
wmak{at}fedex.com
cmkklam{at}cityu.edu.hk

In the manufacture of circuit boards, panels are immersed sequentially in a series of tanks, with upper and lower bounds on the processing time within each tank. The panels are mounted on carriers that are lowered into and raised from the tanks, and transported from tank to tank by programmable hoists. The sequence of hoist moves does not have to follow the sequence of processing stages for the circuit boards. By optimising the sequence of hoist moves, we can maximise the production throughput.

We consider simple cyclic schedules, where the hoist move sequence repeats every cycle and one panel is completed per cycle. Phillips and Unger (1976) developed the first mixed integer programming model for finding the hoist move schedule to minimise the cycle time for lines with only one hoist. We discuss how their formulation can be tightened, and introduce new valid inequalities. We present the first mixed integer programming formulation for finding the minimum-time cycle for lines with multiple hoists and present valid inequalities for this problem. Some preliminary computational results are also presented.

Subject classifications: mixed integer programming; applications, formulation; production/scheduling; applications, cyclic scheduling; industries; chemical, electric, hoist scheduling.
History: Received February 2001; revision received September 2002; accepted August 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MSOMHome page
M. Dawande, M. Pinedo, and C. Sriskandarajah
Multiple Part-Type Production in Robotic Cells: Equivalence of Two Real-World Models
MSOM, April 1, 2009; 11(2): 210 - 228.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by INFORMS.