Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 52, No. 6, November-December 2004, pp. 954-964
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1040.0138
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bish, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Optimal Investment Strategies for Flexible Resources, Considering Pricing and Correlated Demands

Ebru K. Bish, Qiong Wang

Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0118
Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0118

ebru{at}vt.edu
qiwang1{at}vt.edu

We study the optimal resource investment decision faced by a two-product, price-setting firm that operates in a monopolistic setting and employs a postponed pricing scheme. The firm has the option to invest in dedicated resources as well as a more expensive, flexible resource that can satisfy both products. While the resource investment decision is made under demand uncertainty, pricing and resource allocation decisions are postponed to the time when demand curves are realized. Our analysis provides the structure of the firm's optimal resource investment strategy as a function of demand parameters and investment costs, and shows that the flexible resource investment decision follows a threshold policy. We also show that it can be optimal for the firm to invest in the flexible resource even when demand patterns are perfectly positively correlated. The reason for flexible capacity investment in this case is financial rather than risk pooling. On the other hand, we show that it can be optimal for the firm not to invest in the flexible resource even when demand patterns are perfectly negatively correlated. The flexible resource investment decision in this case depends on the profitability of the two products. Based on our analysis, we provide principles on the firm's optimal resource investment decision.

Subject classifications: facilities/equipment planning; resource flexibility; pricing; uncertainty; inventory/production; substitution and demand correlation; stochastic.
History: Received August 2002; revision received March 2003; accepted November 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
B. Tomlin and Y. Wang
Pricing and Operational Recourse in Coproduction Systems
Management Science, March 1, 2008; 54(3): 522 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
J. A. Van Mieghem
Risk Mitigation in Newsvendor Networks: Resource Diversification, Flexibility, Sharing, and Hedging
Management Science, August 1, 2007; 53(8): 1269 - 1288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
M. Goyal and S. Netessine
Strategic Technology Choice and Capacity Investment Under Demand Uncertainty
Management Science, February 1, 2007; 53(2): 192 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
J. Chod and N. Rudi
Resource Flexibility with Responsive Pricing
Operations Research, May 1, 2005; 53(3): 532 - 548.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
E. K. Bish, A. Muriel, and S. Biller
Managing Flexible Capacity in a Make-to-Order Environment
Management Science, February 1, 2005; 51(2): 167 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by INFORMS.