Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 52, No. 6, November-December 2004, pp. 887-896
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1040.0127
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, X.
Right arrow Articles by Simchi-Levi, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Coordinating Inventory Control and Pricing Strategies with Random Demand and Fixed Ordering Cost: The Finite Horizon Case

Xin Chen, David Simchi-Levi

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307

xinchen{at}uiuc.edu
dslevi{at}mit.edu

We analyze a finite horizon, single product, periodic review model in which pricing and production/inventory decisions are made simultaneously. Demands in different periods are random variables that are independent of each other and their distributions depend on the product price. Pricing and ordering decisions are made at the beginning of each period and all shortages are backlogged. Ordering cost includes both a fixed cost and a variable cost proportional to the amount ordered. The objective is to find an inventory policy and a pricing strategy maximizing expected profit over the finite horizon. We show that when the demand model is additive, the profit-to-go functions are k-concave and hence an (s, S, p) policy is optimal. In such a policy, the period inventory is managed based on the classical (s, S) policy and price is determined based on the inventory position at the beginning of each period. For more general demand functions, i.e., multiplicative plus additive functions, we demonstrate that the profit-to-go function is not necessarily k-concave and an (s, S, p) policy is not necessarily optimal. We introduce a new concept, the symmetric k-concave functions, and apply it to provide a characterization of the optimal policy.

Subject classifications: inventory/production; uncertainty; stochastic; planning horizons; operating characteristics; marketing; pricing.
History: Received May 2002; revision received February 2003; accepted October 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MSOMHome page
H.-S. Ahn, M. Gumus, and P. Kaminsky
Inventory, Discounts, and the Timing Effect
MSOM, October 1, 2009; 11(4): 613 - 629.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
F. de Vericourt and M. S. Lobo
Resource and Revenue Management in Nonprofit Operations
Operations Research, September 1, 2009; 57(5): 1114 - 1128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
Q. Li, X. Wu, and K. L. Cheung
Optimal Policies for Inventory Systems with Separate Delivery-Request and Order-Quantity Decisions
Operations Research, May 1, 2009; 57(3): 626 - 636.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
Y. Song, S. Ray, and T. Boyaci
Technical Note--Optimal Dynamic Joint Inventory-Pricing Control for Multiplicative Demand with Fixed Order Costs and Lost Sales
Operations Research, January 1, 2009; 57(1): 245 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
W. T. Huh and G. Janakiraman
(s, S) Optimality in Joint Inventory-Pricing Control: An Alternate Approach
Operations Research, May 1, 2008; 56(3): 783 - 790.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
B. Tomlin and Y. Wang
Pricing and Operational Recourse in Coproduction Systems
Management Science, March 1, 2008; 54(3): 522 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
W. T. Huh and G. Janakiraman
Inventory Management with Auctions and Other Sales Channels: Optimality of (s, S) Policies
Management Science, January 1, 2008; 54(1): 139 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
H.-s. Ahn, M. Gumus, and P. Kaminsky
Pricing and Manufacturing Decisions When Demand Is a Function of Prices in Multiple Periods
Operations Research, November 1, 2007; 55(6): 1039 - 1057.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
X. Chen, M. Sim, D. Simchi-Levi, and P. Sun
Risk Aversion in Inventory Management
Operations Research, September 1, 2007; 55(5): 828 - 842.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
Q. Ye and I. Duenyas
Optimal Capacity Investment Decisions with Two-Sided Fixed-Capacity Adjustment Costs
Operations Research, March 1, 2007; 55(2): 272 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
J. Semple
Note: Generalized Notions of Concavity with an Application to Capacity Management
Operations Research, March 1, 2007; 55(2): 284 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
Y. Wang
Joint Pricing-Production Decisions in Supply Chains of Complementary Products with Uncertain Demand
Operations Research, November 1, 2006; 54(6): 1110 - 1127.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
R. Caldentey and L. M. Wein
Revenue Management of a Make-to-Stock Queue
Operations Research, September 1, 2006; 54(5): 859 - 875.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
C. Maglaras
Revenue Management for a Multiclass Single-Server Queue via a Fluid Model Analysis
Operations Research, September 1, 2006; 54(5): 914 - 932.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
S. Deng and C. A. Yano
Joint Production and Pricing Decisions with Setup Costs and Capacity Constraints
Management Science, May 1, 2006; 52(5): 741 - 756.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
MSOMHome page
L. M. Ann Chan, D. Simchi-Levi, and J. Swann
Pricing, Production, and Inventory Policies for Manufacturing with Stochastic Demand and Discretionary Sales
MSOM, January 1, 2006; 8(2): 149 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by INFORMS.