Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 52, No. 4, July-August 2004, pp. 606-622
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1040.0125
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roemer, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmadi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Concurrent Crashing and Overlapping in Product Development

Thomas A. Roemer, Reza Ahmadi

Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 30 Wadsworth Street, E53-387, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
Anderson School of Management, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095

troemer{at}mit.edu
rahmadi{at}anderson.ucla.edu

This research addresses two common tools for reducing product development lead times: overlapping of development stages and crashing of development times. For the first time in the product development literature, a formal model addresses both tools concurrently, thus facilitating analysis of the interdependencies between overlapping and crashing.

The results exhibit the necessity of addressing overlapping and crashing concurrently, and exhibit general characteristics of optimal overlapping/crashing policies. The impact of different evolution/sensitivity constellations on optimal policies is investigated, and comprehensive guidelines for structuring development processes are provided.

For the special case of linear costs, an efficient procedure is presented that generates the efficient time-cost trade-off curves and determines the corresponding optimal overlapping/crashing policies. The impact of key parameters and the robustness regarding their estimates is illustrated with a simple two-stage example.

Subject classifications: product development processes; overlapping; crashing; development leadtimes; development costs.
History: Received June 2001; revision received May 2002; accepted August 2003.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by INFORMS.