Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 51, No. 3, May-June 2003, pp. 371-386
DOI: 10.1287/opre.51.3.371.14954
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plambeck, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zenios, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Incentive Efficient Control of a Make-to-Stock Production System

Erica L. Plambeck, Stefanos A. Zenios

Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, Calfornia 94305
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, Calfornia 94305

elp{at}stanford.edu
stefzen{at}stanford.edu

This paper considers a principal-agent variant of the classical make-to-stock single-server queueing system. The principal incurs all costs for holding inventory and backordering demand. The agent dynamically controls the production rate at the server and incurs a convex production cost. The principal cannot monitor the production rate but can draw inference from increases in the inventory level. Furthermore, by making payments contingent on the inventory level, the principal motivates the agent to control the production rate in a manner that will minimize the principal's own total expected discounted cost. We show that an optimal incentive payment scheme consists of piece rates and inventory penalties that vary dynamically with the inventory level. This scheme coordinates the system if the agent is risk neutral. Otherwise, operational performance is degraded by the conflict in incentives between principal and agent. We identify some drivers of this agency loss: In addition to discounting and risk aversion in the agent's preferences, which are standard causes of friction in dynamic agency models, an increasing marginal cost of production and slack in the agent's capacity are also found to be lead contributors. Heavy traffic analysis supports these findings through closed-form expressions for the performance of the system under the optimal incentive scheme.

Subject classifications: Games, noncooperative: dynamic principal agent model, VMI contract; Inventory/production, stochastic: make-to-stock; Dynamic programming: infinite horizon with risk aversion.
History: Received March 2000; revision received June 2001; accepted May 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
P. Crama, B. D. Reyck, and Z. Degraeve
Milestone Payments or Royalties? Contract Design for R&D Licensing
Operations Research, November 1, 2008; 56(6): 1539 - 1552.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
MSOMHome page
K.-S. Choi, J. G. Dai, and J.-S. Song
On Measuring Supplier Performance Under Vendor-Managed-Inventory Programs in Capacitated Supply Chains
MSOM, January 1, 2004; 6(1): 53 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by INFORMS.