Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 48, No. 5, September-October 2000, pp. 761-767
DOI: 10.1287/opre.48.5.761.12406
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grosfeld-Nir, A.
Right arrow Articles by He, Q.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Manufacturing to Order with Random Yield and Costly Inspection

Abraham Grosfeld-Nir, Yigal Gerchak, Qi-Ming He

Faculty of Management, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 69978
Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
Department of Industrial Engineering, DalTech, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2X4

grosfeld{at}taunivmtau.ac.il
ygerchak{at}engmail.uwaterloo.ca
qi-ming.he{at}dal.ca

This study considers a situation where a contractor receives an order that it commits to satisfy in full. The fulfillment of the contract requires manufacturing and inspection. Because the number of defective units within a produced lot is not known in advance, it is possible that after examining the lot, it is learned that the number of conforming units is short of the demand. If so, further manufacturing and inspection are required. Once enough conforming units are found, the inspection terminates, and the remaining uninspected units, as well as all defectives, are scrapped.

Whereas previous "multiple production runs" studies implicitly assumed that inspection costs are negligible, we include these costs as a key part of the problem. It turns out that the optimal production lot size depends on the inspection cost. Our model is very general: We provide a framework to calculate the optimal batch and the expected number of inspections for any yield pattern, as well as for any inspection procedure. We also provide results and numerical examples concerning specific yield patterns that are common in practice.

Subject classifications: Random yield production; Inspection; Lot sizing.
History: Received October 1997; revision received October 1998; revision received March 1999; accepted March 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
K. Zhu, R. Q. Zhang, and F. Tsung
Pushing Quality Improvement Along Supply Chains
Management Science, March 1, 2007; 53(3): 421 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
Q. Li and S. Zheng
Joint Inventory Replenishment and Pricing Control for Systems with Uncertain Yield and Demand
Operations Research, July 1, 2006; 54(4): 696 - 705.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
S. Anily and A. Grosfeld-Nir
An Optimal Lot-Sizing and Offline Inspection Policy in the Case of Nonrigid Demand
Operations Research, March 1, 2006; 54(2): 311 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by INFORMS.