Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 48, No. 5, September-October 2000, pp. 661-670
DOI: 10.1287/opre.48.5.661.12402
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirby, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Operations Research Trajectories: The Anglo-American Experience from the 1940s to the 1990s

Maurice W. Kirby

Department of Economics, The Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YX, United Kingdom
m.kirby{at}lancaster.ac.uk

This paper is derived from the author's sponsored history of Operations Research in Britain from its formal inception in the later 1930s. It is inspired by the knowledge that any history of OR in Britain that ignores the interrelationship with OR in the United States would be grossly incomplete. This relates not only to the period of military collaboration in World War II but also to the profound influence on British operations researchers of American-derived techniques and methods. The Anglo-American perspective serves also to highlight major contrasts, as well as striking similarities in the development of OR in both countries. The paper advocates the need for ongoing research into the history of OR as an essential complement to the advancing frontier of knowledge, both in theory and in practice. Virtually all disciplines worthy of university-level study have their chroniclers, and this should apply with no less force to OR in the light of its impressive trajectory of development and early acknowledgment of its utilitarian value in a wide variety of settings in the public and private sectors.

Subject classifications: History of OR/MS: Anglo/U.S. comparisons and contrasts; OR/MS philosophy: Anglo/U.S. comparisons and contrasts.
History: Received January 1999; accepted May 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
M. S. Sodhi and C. S. Tang
The OR/MS Ecosystem: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats
Operations Research, March 1, 2008; 56(2): 267 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
M. W. Kirby
Paradigm Change in Operations Research: Thirty Years of Debate
Operations Research, January 1, 2007; 55(1): 1 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
M. Denizel, B. Usdiken, and D. Tuncalp
Drift or Shift? Continuity, Change, and International Variation in Knowledge Production in OR/MS
Operations Research, September 1, 2003; 51(5): 711 - 720.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
M. Shubik
Game Theory and Operations Research: Some Musings 50 Years Later
Operations Research, January 1, 2002; 50(1): 192 - 196.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by INFORMS.