Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 47, No. 3, May-June 1999, pp. 379-394
DOI: 10.1287/opre.47.3.379
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertsimas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Chryssikou, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Bounds and Policies for Dynamic Routing in Loss Networks

Dimitris Bertsimas, Thalia Chryssikou

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

We consider the problem of maximizing a weighted sum of expected rewards in steady-state in multiclass loss networks under dynamic routing and admission control, with Poisson arrivals and exponentially distributed holding times. By aggregating the underlying Markov decision process, we derive linear programming relaxations that contain the achievable performance region under all admissible policies and lead to a series of progressively tighter upper bounds. These relaxations allow stronger bounds at the expense of higher computational times. We further propose a series of routing and admission control policies from the relaxations that outperform, in computational experiments, other heuristic policies, such as the dynamic alternative routing with trunk reservation and the least busy alternative routing, variations of which are used in practice. The suboptimality guarantees defined as best bound/best policy range from 0 to 2.5% under symmetry conditions (symmetric network topology, arrival rates, link capacities, rewards), and from 4% to 10% under asymmetry conditions. We discuss the qualitative behavior of these policies and obtain insights about their performance.

Subject classifications: programming; dynamic/optimal control; upper bounds for performance of loss network; communication heuristics; policies for dynamic routing.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by INFORMS.